<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Just Say No to Verified SEO and TopSEOs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.justsaynotoverifiedseo.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.justsaynotoverifiedseo.com</link>
	<description>The Verified SEO resource site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:41:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TopSEOs Strikes Back! by Anonymous Sorry</title>
		<link>http://www.justsaynotoverifiedseo.com/top-seos-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Sorry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justsaynotoverifiedseo.com/?p=150#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I recently had a conversation with someone there. The first 2 minutes were &quot;we&#039;ll rank you on our site&quot; based on an &quot;agreed financial model&quot;  I asked him about independent research, and basically it&#039;s verifying references you provide them.  He then told me the better the financial model we agree to with them, the higher we will rank.  It is definitely not legitimate and surprised it continues to exist. He was very abrasive when I started poking holes in his practice and told him that based on these 2 minutes, we&#039;re not interested.  He then pouted and said &quot;forget about it&quot; and hung up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently had a conversation with someone there. The first 2 minutes were "we'll rank you on our site" based on an "agreed financial model"  I asked him about independent research, and basically it's verifying references you provide them.  He then told me the better the financial model we agree to with them, the higher we will rank.  It is definitely not legitimate and surprised it continues to exist. He was very abrasive when I started poking holes in his practice and told him that based on these 2 minutes, we're not interested.  He then pouted and said "forget about it" and hung up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verified SEO - Just Say No! by Tweets that mention Verified SEO – Just Say No! -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.justsaynotoverifiedseo.com/verified-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Verified SEO – Just Say No! -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justsaynotoverifiedseo.com/?p=15#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by David Blizzard. David Blizzard said: Hey! @pageoneresults we&#039;ve got badges for the BEST SEOs http://www.justsaynotoverifiedseo.com/verified-seo/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by David Blizzard. David Blizzard said: Hey! @pageoneresults we&#39;ve got badges for the BEST SEOs <a href="http://www.justsaynotoverifiedseo.com/verified-seo/" rel="nofollow">http://www.justsaynotoverifiedseo.com/verified-seo/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

